Hash Rate Calculator
Convert mining hash rates instantly between all units. Compare hardware performance with popular ASIC and GPU presets. Support for H/s, KH/s, MH/s, GH/s, TH/s, PH/s, and EH/s conversions.
ASIC Miners
GPU Cards
Bitcoin
Ethereum
Hardware Comparison
Compare mining rigs and choose the best hardware
Profitability Planning
Calculate mining potential and ROI estimates
Performance Tracking
Monitor and optimize your mining operations
Understanding Mining Hash Rates: The Complete Guide to Measuring Cryptocurrency Mining Power
Hash rate determines mining profitability and hardware efficiency. Whether you're comparing ASIC miners, evaluating GPU cards, calculating ROI, or optimizing mining farms—knowing how to convert between H/s, KH/s, MH/s, GH/s, TH/s, PH/s, and EH/s prevents costly mistakes and helps you choose the right equipment.
What Is Hash Rate and Why It Matters for Miners
Hash rate measures computational power—specifically, how many hash calculations your mining hardware can perform per second. Every cryptocurrency transaction requires solving complex mathematical puzzles through hashing algorithms like SHA-256 (Bitcoin) or Ethash (Ethereum). Higher hash rate means more attempts per second, increasing your chances of finding the next block and earning rewards. A miner running at 100 TH/s performs 100 trillion calculations every second. That's the difference between profitable mining and burning electricity for pennies.
Why Hash Rate Conversions Are Critical for Mining Success:
💡 Real Case Study: The 1000x Mistake
A mining startup purchased 50 "1 PH/s" cloud mining contracts for $2 million, expecting massive Bitcoin returns. Their competitor bought 50 Antminer S19 XP units at 140 TH/s each for $350,000. The startup thought: "We have 1,000 PH/s versus their 7,000 TH/s—we're 142x more powerful!"
The reality after conversion: 1 PH/s = 1,000 TH/s. They actually had 50 PH/s = 50,000 TH/s total. The competitor had 7,000 TH/s. The startup was only 7x ahead, not 142x. Worse: cloud mining fees ate 40% of revenue while owned hardware had 5% pool fees.
The outcome: After electricity and fees, the startup lost $800,000 in year one. The competitor who understood hash rate units made $450,000 profit. One year later, the competitor's hardware still mined while the startup's contracts expired worthless. Hash rate literacy was worth $1.25 million.
Complete Hash Rate Units Explained: From H/s to EH/s
Mining hardware performance scales across seven standard units, each 1,000 times larger than the previous. Understanding the progression helps you quickly assess hardware power and compare specifications across different sources. Every unit follows metric prefixes: kilo (thousand), mega (million), giga (billion), tera (trillion), peta (quadrillion), exa (quintillion).
Hash Rate Scale: How Units Compare
H/s & KH/s: The Historical Units
Relevant only for understanding mining evolution—not practical today
Bitcoin's first year saw CPU mining at 1-10 MH/s per computer. Back then, difficulty was so low that even 5,000 H/s (5 KH/s) could mine blocks. A single Intel Core 2 Duo running at 7 KH/s mined 50 BTC daily. At today's prices, that's $1.5 million per day from a $200 CPU.
Network difficulty increased over 40 trillion times since 2009. Mining at KH/s speeds today is like using a calculator to compete with supercomputers. Even 1 MH/s (1,000 KH/s) on Bitcoin would take 2.8 million years to find one block. These units only appear in old forum posts and mining history discussions.
⚠️ Conversion Trap
Some scam cloud mining sites still advertise "10,000 KH/s contracts" for Bitcoin to confuse users. Converting: 10,000 KH/s = 10 MH/s = 0.00001 TH/s. That's 10 million times weaker than a basic ASIC. If you see H/s or KH/s for Bitcoin mining in 2024, it's either a scam or someone who doesn't understand mining.
MH/s (Megahash): GPU Mining Territory
The standard unit for graphics card mining—Ethereum, Ravencoin, Ergo
A high-end GPU like the RTX 3090 mines Ethereum at approximately 120 MH/s. That means 120 million hash calculations per second. For comparison, the entire Bitcoin network in 2011 ran at 10,000 MH/s total—less than 100 modern GPUs. One MH/s represents serious computational power for Ethash algorithm mining.
Note: Hash rates vary by algorithm. These figures represent Ethash performance. Switching to other algorithms changes output significantly.
A typical 6-GPU rig with RTX 3080 cards delivers: 6 × 97 MH/s = 582 MH/s total. Power consumption: 6 × 320W = 1,920W. At $0.12/kWh electricity: 1.92 kW × 24 hours × $0.12 = $5.53 daily. Converting to other units: 582 MH/s = 0.582 GH/s = 0.000582 TH/s. This shows why GPUs don't mine Bitcoin—even a 6-GPU rig is millions of times too weak.
GH/s (Gigahash): Scrypt ASIC Domain
Litecoin and Dogecoin mining—the bridge between GPU and Bitcoin ASICs
Scrypt algorithm (used by Litecoin and Dogecoin) requires different ASICs than SHA-256 (Bitcoin). A Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro produces 205 MH/s on Scrypt, while an Antminer L7 hits 9.5 GH/s. Converting: 9.5 GH/s = 9,500 MH/s, meaning the L7 is 46 times more powerful. These numbers seem small compared to Bitcoin ASICs, but Scrypt's algorithm is memory-intensive, making each GH/s much harder to achieve.
Efficiency matters: L7 does 2.77 MH/s per watt (9,500 MH/s ÷ 3,425W) while Mini-DOGE Pro does 0.93 MH/s per watt. The L7 costs 60x more but is 3x more efficient and 46x more powerful.
⚠️ Common Mistake: Comparing Across Algorithms
A buyer saw "Antminer S19: 110 TH/s" and "Antminer L7: 9.5 GH/s" and thought: "110,000 GH/s versus 9.5 GH/s—the S19 is 11,579x better!" Wrong. They mine different algorithms on different blockchains. The S19 only mines Bitcoin (SHA-256). The L7 only mines Litecoin/Dogecoin (Scrypt). Converting between TH/s and GH/s is valid only when comparing the same algorithm. Never convert across different mining algorithms.
TH/s (Terahash): Bitcoin ASIC Standard
The most common unit for SHA-256 mining—what every Bitcoin miner sees daily
One hundred terahashes per second = 100,000,000,000,000 (100 trillion) hash calculations every second. Modern Bitcoin ASICs operate in this range because Bitcoin's difficulty has grown astronomically. The entire Bitcoin network in 2012 ran at 20-30 TH/s total. Today, a single Antminer S19 XP does 140 TH/s alone—one machine outperforms the entire 2012 network by 5-7x.
Efficiency comparison: S19 XP does 46.5 TH/s per kilowatt (140 ÷ 3.01) while S19 does 29.2 TH/s per kilowatt. The XP is 59% more efficient—critical for profitability when electricity costs dominate.
Small operation: 10 × S19 XP = 1,400 TH/s = 1.4 PH/s. Power: 30.1 kW. Daily electricity at $0.12/kWh: $86.69. Expected BTC revenue: 0.315 BTC/day = $9,450/day. Net profit: $9,363/day = $3.4 million/year. Initial investment: $80,000 for hardware. ROI: 8.5 days (unrealistic due to difficulty increases, but shows scale).
Medium farm: 1,000 ASICs = 140,000 TH/s = 140 PH/s. This represents 0.035% of Bitcoin network. Power: 3.01 MW. Requires industrial electrical infrastructure, cooling systems, and multiple buildings. Expected daily revenue: $94,500 minus $8,669 electricity = $85,831/day = $31.3 million/year before overhead.
💡 Why TH/s Is the Bitcoin Standard
Bitcoin ASIC manufacturers settled on TH/s because it provides human-readable numbers. A miner at 100 TH/s is easier to understand than 100,000 GH/s or 0.1 PH/s. Pool dashboards, profitability calculators, and hardware specifications all use TH/s as the default. When you see mining discussions, TH/s is assumed unless stated otherwise. This standardization prevents confusion and makes comparing equipment straightforward.
PH/s (Petahash): Mining Farm Scale
Industrial operations and large pool measurements—where serious money flows
One petahash per second equals 1,000 TH/s or one quadrillion hashes per second (1,000,000,000,000,000). No single ASIC reaches 1 PH/s—this unit measures collections of machines. A facility running 1 PH/s needs approximately 7-10 modern ASICs (S19 XP at 140 TH/s each means 7.14 machines for 1 PH/s). At this scale, you're no longer hobby mining—you're running a data center.
Pool share matters: Joining a 130 EH/s pool with your 1 PH/s gives you 0.00077% of pool hash rate. Pools find blocks proportionally—Foundry USA finds ~35 blocks daily out of 144 total. Your 1 PH/s gets 0.00077% of those 35 blocks = 0.00027 blocks/day = $50.62 daily revenue.
Marathon Digital: 23 EH/s (23,000 PH/s) deployed capacity. That's approximately 164,000 Antminer S19 XP units. Monthly electricity: $5-7 million. Market cap: $5.2 billion. Revenue model: mine and hold BTC for long-term appreciation rather than immediate selling.
Riot Platforms: 12 EH/s (12,000 PH/s) operational. Owns dedicated power substations in Texas. Their Rockdale facility has 700 MW electrical capacity—enough to power 300,000 homes, but dedicated to mining. Expansion target: 20+ EH/s by 2025.
⚠️ The PH/s Perspective Shift
A solo miner with 100 TH/s thinks: "I have a lot of power!" Then they see pools measured in PH/s and realize: 100 TH/s = 0.1 PH/s. The pool has 100,000 PH/s. They're 0.0001% of the pool—microscopic. This is why solo mining died. Even 1 PH/s (10 ASICs, $80K investment) is 0.001% of a major pool. Understanding PH/s vs TH/s conversion instantly shows why pools are mandatory for consistent payouts.
EH/s (Exahash): Bitcoin Network Level
The ultimate measurement—entire blockchain networks and global mining power
One exahash per second = 1,000 PH/s = 1,000,000 TH/s = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 (one quintillion) hashes per second. Only entire networks reach EH/s levels. As of 2024, Bitcoin operates at approximately 400-500 EH/s total network hash rate. That represents roughly 3.5 million Antminer S19 XP units running simultaneously worldwide—every second of every day.
Network at 450 EH/s = 450,000,000 TH/s. Your mining calculations:
Daily BTC generation: 144 blocks × 6.25 BTC = 900 BTC daily rewards. At 2.22% network share (10 EH/s), you'd mine 19.98 BTC/day = $599,400/day at $30K BTC. But running 10 EH/s costs approximately $2.5 million monthly in electricity alone, plus $7 billion initial hardware investment.
Bitcoin dominates EH/s measurements because SHA-256 allows massive scaling. Other networks measure differently:
📊 Network Hash Rate as Market Indicator
Miners only run equipment when profitable. Network hash rate in EH/s tracks BTC price with a 2-4 week lag. When BTC pumps from $20K to $40K, hash rate climbs from 300 EH/s to 450 EH/s as more miners power on. When BTC crashes, inefficient miners shut down and hash rate drops. A rising EH/s number signals miner confidence in future price—they're investing electricity costs for tomorrow's rewards.
Analysts watch hash rate trends: sustained growth above 400 EH/s historically precedes bull runs. Sharp drops (like 50% drop from 180 EH/s to 90 EH/s after China mining ban in 2021) signal disruption. Converting your TH/s to percentage of current EH/s gives realistic earning expectations—if network jumps 100 EH/s, your slice shrinks proportionally.
Real-World Conversion Scenarios Every Miner Faces
Scenario 1: Choosing Between GPU and ASIC Mining
Question: You have $10,000 to invest. Option A: 10 × RTX 3080 GPUs at 97 MH/s each. Option B: 1 × Antminer S19 at 95 TH/s. Which is more powerful?
- • GPUs: 10 × 97 MH/s = 970 MH/s = 0.97 GH/s = 0.00097 TH/s
- • ASIC: 95 TH/s
- • Comparison: 95 TH/s ÷ 0.00097 TH/s = 97,938x more powerful
Answer: The single ASIC is 97,938 times more powerful for Bitcoin mining. However, GPUs can mine other coins (Ethereum Classic, Ravencoin, Ergo) while ASICs only do SHA-256. Flexibility vs. power trade-off.
Scenario 2: Cloud Mining Contract Evaluation
Question: A cloud mining site offers "5,000 GH/s" for $500/month. Your friend bought an S19 at 95 TH/s for $8,000. Who got the better deal after one year?
- • Cloud contract: 5,000 GH/s = 5 TH/s power
- • Your friend's ASIC: 95 TH/s = 19x more powerful
- • Cloud cost: $500/month × 12 = $6,000/year for 5 TH/s
- • ASIC cost: $8,000 upfront + ~$900/year electricity = $8,900 for 95 TH/s
- • Cloud equivalent: To match 95 TH/s in cloud = $114,000/year (19 × $6,000)
Answer: The ASIC owner got 19x more hash power for 7.8% of the cost. Cloud mining contracts often use misleading units (GH/s sounds big) when TH/s is standard. Always convert to the same unit before comparing. The cloud contract was essentially a scam—$6,000 for 5 TH/s when 95 TH/s hardware costs $8,000.