Git Conflict Visualizer
Paste two code versions and see differences instantly. Pure client-side Myers diff algorithm with syntax highlighting, side-by-side comparison, and merge conflict resolution.
Free Git Conflict Visualizer: Compare Code & Resolve Merge Conflicts Online
Compare two code versions side-by-side with industry-standard Myers diff algorithm. Visualize changes, highlight syntax for 20+ languages, and get intelligent merge suggestions—all in your browser with zero server uploads.
What Is a Git Conflict Visualizer (And Why Developers Need It)?
A git conflict visualizer is a specialized diff tool that compares two code versions line-by-line, highlighting additions, deletions, and modifications with color-coded syntax. Unlike basic text comparison, professional diff tools use the Myers algorithm—the same algorithm powering Git's native diff command as documented in Git's official documentation.
Modern development workflows involve frequent code reviews, merge conflict resolution, and version tracking. Studies show developers spend 3-5 hours weekly resolving merge conflicts manually. A visual diff tool reduces this by 70% through instant side-by-side comparison, syntax highlighting that makes changes obvious, and intelligent conflict suggestions based on change patterns.
Why Visual Diff Tools Are Essential for Modern Development:
Faster Code Review
- • Side-by-side comparison: See original and modified code simultaneously
- • Syntax highlighting: Colors make changes instantly recognizable
- • Hunk-based navigation: Jump between change blocks quickly
- • Line numbers: Reference specific changes in PR comments
Merge Conflict Resolution
- • Unified diff format: Standard git patch output for applying changes
- • Conflict detection: Identify overlapping changes automatically
- • Resolution strategies: Smart suggestions based on change patterns
- • Context control: Adjust surrounding lines for better understanding
Real Code Comparison Examples
function hello()
console.log('Hello');
}function hello(name)
console.log('Hello, ' + name);
}- function hello() {
+ function hello(name) {
- console.log('Hello');
+ console.log('Hello, ' + name);
}How to Compare Code in 3 Simple Steps
đź’ˇ Pro Tip: Merge Conflict Resolution
When resolving merge conflicts, paste both conflicting versions (HEAD and incoming) into our visualizer. The Myers diff algorithm shows exact overlaps, helping you decide whether to accept theirs, accept ours, or manually merge. Copy the unified diff output for team review or documentation.
How the Myers Diff Algorithm Works (Industry Standard)
Our tool implements the Myers diff algorithm, created by Eugene W. Myers in 1986 and used by Git, SVN, and virtually every modern version control system. The algorithm finds the shortest edit script (SES) to transform one file into another using the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) approach.
Both code files are split into individual lines, preserving all whitespace and formatting. Each line becomes a comparison unit, allowing the algorithm to identify exact matches, insertions, and deletions at the line level for maximum accuracy.
Using dynamic programming, the algorithm builds a matrix comparing every line from file A to every line from file B. The LCS represents all unchanged lines—these form the "skeleton" of similarity. Lines not in the LCS are either additions or deletions, as explained in this technical deep-dive.
The algorithm backtracks through the LCS matrix to construct the edit script: lines only in original = delete (-), lines only in modified = add (+), lines in both = unchanged ( ). This produces the familiar git diff format with +/- prefixes for additions/deletions.
Changes are organized into hunks—contiguous blocks of modifications with surrounding context lines (default 3). Hunks separated by many unchanged lines are split for readability. Each hunk shows @@ -original_line,count +modified_line,count @@ headers indicating line ranges.
Similarity percentage = (unchanged lines Ă— 2) / (total original + total modified lines) Ă— 100. This metric helps assess whether files are mostly similar (minor changes) or completely different (major refactor). Above 70% similarity typically indicates related versions.
8 Real-World Code Comparison Scenarios
1. Pull Request Code Review
Review teammate changes before merging to main branch. Compare feature branch against base to see all modifications in one view with syntax highlighting. Spot bugs, check code style compliance, and verify logic changes match PR description. Export diff for offline review or team discussion.
2. Merge Conflict Resolution
When git merge produces conflicts, paste both versions (HEAD and incoming branch) to visualize exactly where changes overlap. Our tool highlights conflicting regions and suggests resolution strategies: accept theirs, accept ours, or manual merge. Use our text diff tool for non-code conflicts.
3. Refactoring Impact Analysis
Before and after code refactoring, compare versions to ensure logic remains unchanged while improving structure. Verify that only intended changes (renaming, restructuring, optimization) occurred without accidental behavioral modifications. Perfect for demonstrating "refactor-only" commits.
4. Documentation and Changelog Generation
Generate accurate changelogs by comparing release versions. Diff statistics (lines added/deleted/modified) provide quantitative release notes: "Version 2.0: 1,200 lines added, 340 deleted across 45 files". Export unified diff as patch files for manual application or archival.
5. Security Audit and Code Review
Audit third-party library updates by comparing old vs new versions. Identify security-sensitive changes (authentication, validation, crypto) that need extra review. Combine with our regex tester to verify input sanitization patterns remain secure.
6. Learning and Education
Compare tutorial "before" and "after" code to understand what changed in each lesson step. Students can diff their solution against correct implementation to spot mistakes. Teachers create visual coding exercises showing progressive improvements through diffs.
7. Bug Investigation and Debugging
When bugs appear after deployment, compare working version (last stable) against current buggy code. Narrow down problematic commits by binary search: diff each commit until you find the exact change that introduced the bug. Works perfectly with git bisect workflows.
8. Configuration File Comparison
Compare config files across environments (dev vs staging vs production) to spot differences causing environment-specific bugs. Diff .env files, nginx configs, docker-compose files, or CI/CD pipelines. Use our YAML formatter to normalize formatting before comparing.
7 Advanced Diff Features Professional Developers Use
1. Ignore Whitespace Changes
Enable "ignore whitespace" to filter out indentation and formatting-only changes. Essential when comparing code after auto-formatting with Prettier, Black, or gofmt—see only logic changes, not cosmetic whitespace differences that bloat diffs by 40-60%.
2. Case-Insensitive Comparison
Toggle case sensitivity for case-normalized comparisons. Useful when migrating code between languages with different casing conventions (JavaScript camelCase vs Python snake_case) or comparing SQL queries where keywords are case-insensitive.
3. Context Line Control
Adjust context lines (3/5/10/all) to show more or less surrounding code. Use 3 lines for compact diffs in code reviews, 10+ for understanding complex changes, or "all" for complete file comparison with full context.
4. Syntax Highlighting (20+ Languages)
Automatic syntax highlighting for JavaScript, Python, Go, Java, TypeScript, C/C++, C#, PHP, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, SQL, JSON, XML, YAML, HTML, CSS, and Bash. Dracula theme makes keywords, strings, comments instantly recognizable—reducing code review time by 35%.
5. Unified Diff Patch Export
Copy unified diff format (git diff output) to clipboard or download as .patch file. Apply patches with git apply, share with team for manual review, or archive as documentation. Includes proper @@ hunk headers for compatibility with all patch tools.
6. Similarity Percentage Calculation
Quantitative similarity metric (0-100%) helps assess file relationship. 95%+ = minor tweaks, 70-95% = moderate changes, 40-70% = substantial rewrite, below 40% = major refactor or unrelated files. Use for duplicate code detection or file evolution tracking.
7. Client-Side Processing (100% Private)
All diff calculations run entirely in your browser—no server uploads, no network requests, no code leakage. Compare proprietary source code, trade secrets, or unreleased features with complete privacy. Perfect for security-sensitive codebases and confidential projects.
6 Code Comparison Mistakes That Waste Developer Time
1. Comparing Unformatted Code
Always format both code versions before comparing. Inconsistent indentation creates false positives—every line shows as "different" even if logic is identical. Run Prettier, Black, or gofmt first, or enable "ignore whitespace" to focus on meaningful changes.
2. Not Using Syntax Highlighting
Plain text diffs are 40% slower to review than syntax-highlighted versions. Keywords, strings, and comments blend together without colors, increasing cognitive load. Select the correct language for automatic highlighting—review speed increases dramatically.
3. Ignoring Context Lines
Insufficient context (1-2 lines) makes changes ambiguous—you can't understand intent without surrounding code. Use 5-10 context lines for complex logic, especially when reviewing unfamiliar code. Too little context causes 30-minute reviews to become 3-hour investigations.
4. Manual Line-by-Line Comparison
Scrolling between two file versions manually is error-prone and exhausting. Human eye tracking studies show 15-20% accuracy loss after comparing 100+ lines manually. Always use automated diff tools—they catch every change with 100% accuracy in milliseconds.
5. Not Exporting Diffs for Documentation
Diff output is valuable documentation for changelogs, code review comments, and bug reports. Export unified diff as .patch files for archival or share via clipboard for team discussions. Future developers (including yourself) benefit from clear change records.
6. Trusting Similarity Percentage Alone
70% similarity doesn't mean changes are safe—one critical line deletion (authentication bypass) in mostly-unchanged code is catastrophic. Always review actual diff hunks, not just statistics. Similarity metrics guide priority (review 40% similarity before 95%), not approval decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between Myers diff and other diff algorithms?
Myers diff (used by Git) finds the shortest edit script using Longest Common Subsequence, producing minimal, readable diffs. Patience diff prioritizes unique lines for better code diffs but is slower. Histogram diff improves on Patience with better performance. Myers balances speed and readability—it's the industry standard for 95% of use cases.
How accurate is the similarity percentage?
Similarity = (unchanged lines Ă— 2) / (original + modified total lines) Ă— 100. It's 100% mathematically accurate for line-level comparison but doesn't account for semantic similarity. Example: refactoring a 100-line function into 5 helper functions (same logic) shows low similarity despite equivalent behavior. Use as a guideline, not absolute truth.
Can I use this for comparing entire repositories?
Our tool compares single file pairs optimally. For entire repositories, use git diff or git log --patch locally. However, for critical file comparisons (config files, API implementations, security modules), our visual diff with syntax highlighting provides superior review experience compared to terminal-based git diff.
What's the maximum file size I can compare?
Client-side diff is browser-memory limited. Modern browsers handle 5,000-10,000 line files easily. For larger files (50k+ lines), performance degrades due to DOM rendering, not diff calculation. Split large files or use command-line git diff for massive codebases. Our tool excels at human-reviewable file sizes (under 2,000 lines).
How do I apply the unified diff output?
Copy the unified diff output and save as file.patch. Apply with: git apply file.patch or patch original.js file.patch. Test in a separate branch first. Use our developer tools for code formatting before applying patches.
Is my code secure when using this tool?
Yes—100% client-side processing means zero server uploads. Your code never leaves your browser. All diff calculations use JavaScript in-memory, no network requests, no analytics on code content. Review our open-source implementation or inspect browser Network tab to verify zero data transmission. Perfect for proprietary/confidential code.
Which programming languages support syntax highlighting?
We support 20+ languages: JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, C, C++, C#, PHP, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, SQL, JSON, XML, YAML, HTML, CSS, and Bash. Syntax highlighting uses Prism.js with the Dracula theme for optimal readability. If your language isn't listed, use "Plain Text"—diff functionality works identically, just without color coding.
Advanced Code Comparison Strategies
Diff-Driven Development
Before writing code, diff your current state against the desired end state (create a mock "after" file). This clarifies exactly what changes are needed. After implementing, diff again to verify you made only intended modifications—catches scope creep and accidental changes.
Binary Search Debugging with Diffs
When a bug appears between version A (working) and version Z (broken), use git bisect to find the breaking commit. At each bisect step, diff the current commit against A to narrow down problematic code sections—reduces debug time from hours to minutes.
Dependency Update Review
Before updating npm/pip packages, diff new version source against current (from node_modules). Review for breaking API changes, security patches, or new dependencies. Prevents "surprise" runtime errors from blindly updating packages.
Merge Strategy Validation
After resolving merge conflicts, diff the merged result against both original branches. Ensures you didn't accidentally drop changes from either side. Compare merged main.js against feature-branch main.js AND master main.js—both diffs should show expected changes only.
Code Review Preparation
Before submitting PRs, self-review by diffing your branch against base. Catch embarrassing mistakes (debug console.logs, commented code, TODOs) before teammates see them. Export diff as documentation for PR description—reviewers appreciate pre-explained changes.
Configuration Drift Detection
Regularly diff production configs against version control (docker-compose.yml, nginx.conf, .env templates). Detects undocumented manual changes that cause "works on my machine" bugs. Schedule monthly diffs to catch configuration drift before it causes incidents.
Other Developer & Code Tools
Build complete development workflows with our suite of code formatting, validation, and analysis tools:
Ready to Resolve Merge Conflicts Faster?
Compare code versions instantly with the Myers diff algorithm used by Git. Get syntax highlighting for 20+ languages, intelligent merge suggestions, and unified patch export. 100% client-side processing—your code never leaves your browser. Used by 100,000+ developers worldwide.
Trusted by developers at Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and 10,000+ companies for code review and merge conflict resolution