Color Blindness Simulator
Simulate how colors appear to people with different types of color vision deficiency. Test accessibility and ensure your designs are inclusive for all users.
Free Color Blindness Simulator: Test CVD Accessibility Online Instantly
Simulate how colors appear to people with color vision deficiency using scientifically accurate Brettel 1997 matrices. Test all 8 CVD types instantly with Delta-E scores, WCAG accessibility guidance, and professional-grade color transformation for designers and developers.
What Is Color Blindness Simulation (And Why It's Critical for Accessibility)?
Color blindness simulation (CVD simulation) transforms colors to show exactly how they appear to people with color vision deficiency. Over 350 million people worldwide experience some form of color blindnessâthat's 8% of men and 0.5% of women according to NIH National Eye Institute. Ignoring color accessibility excludes 1 in 12 males from fully experiencing your designs.
Professional CVD simulation uses scientifically accurate transformation matrices based on peer-reviewed research (Brettel 1997, ViĂŠnot 1999) to convert colors through LMS color spaceâthe way cone cells in the human eye actually perceive light. This ensures simulations match real-world color vision deficiency experiences, unlike simple filters that just desaturate colors.
Why Color Blindness Testing Is Essential for Modern Web Design:
Legal Compliance & Accessibility
- ⢠WCAG 2.1 requirements: Color must not be sole information carrier
- ⢠ADA compliance: Avoid discrimination against users with disabilities
- ⢠Section 508 standards: Required for government contractors
- ⢠European EAA 2025: Mandatory accessibility for EU businesses
Better UX & Business Impact
- ⢠Reach 350M+ users: Don't lose 8% of potential male customers
- ⢠Improve usability: Clear color contrast benefits everyone
- ⢠Reduce errors: Color-coded forms cause 40% more mistakes for CVD users
- ⢠Build trust: Accessibility shows you care about all users
Real Color Blindness Examples
How to Simulate Color Blindness in 3 Simple Steps
đĄ Pro Tip: Color Palette Testing
Test your entire color palette by simulating each color individually and comparing results. Colors that look distinct normally but merge in CVD simulation will cause accessibility issues. Aim for Delta-E scores above 5.0 between interactive elements (buttons, links, states) to ensure WCAG contrast compliance across all vision types.
8 Types of Color Vision Deficiency Our Simulator Tests
Complete absence of long-wavelength (L) cone cells that detect red light. Affects ~1% of males. Red and green colors appear as shades of yellow-brown. Critical for testing traffic lights, error messages, and red/green status indicators. Cannot distinguish red text from black backgrounds in low contrast scenarios.
Missing medium-wavelength (M) cone cells that perceive green. Most common severe CVD at ~1% of males. Similar confusion to Protanopiaâreds and greens merge into yellows/browns. This is why green/red color coding alone violates WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 1.4.1.
Absence of short-wavelength (S) cones for blue detection. Extremely rare at ~0.001% of population. Blue and yellow appear similar (pinkish-gray), while red/green distinction remains intact. Important for testing blue button/yellow warning combinations and sky/ocean scenes in designs.
Defective red cones cause reduced red sensitivity. Affects ~1% of males. Less severe than Protanopiaâreds appear darker and less vibrant but still somewhat distinguishable from greens. Test to ensure red elements have sufficient brightness contrast even when desaturated.
Most common CVD affecting ~5% of males and 0.4% of females (6% of total male population). Greens appear more red, and red/green distinction is reduced but not eliminated. Since this is the highest prevalence CVD, always test your designs for Deuteranomaly at minimum to cover the largest user segment.
Reduced blue sensitivity from defective S cones. Very rare at <0.01% of population. Blue appears greener, and yellow appears pinker. While uncommon, testing ensures blue accent colors maintain sufficient distinctiveness for all users when combined with our color conversion tool.
Complete absence of functional cone cellsâonly rods work, providing grayscale vision. Affects ~0.003% of population (1 in 33,000). All colors converted to shades of gray based on luminance. Critical for testing that your interface works in pure grayscale mode, relying on contrast, patterns, and text labels instead of color alone.
Severely reduced color perception from minimal cone function. Extremely rare at <0.001% of population. Sees mostly grayscale with very faint color hints. While prevalence is low, testing ensures designs work for worst-case scenarios and validates that lightness contrast is sufficient independently of hue.
10 Real-World CVD Simulation Scenarios
1. Web Design & UI Color Palettes
Test button colors, link states, form validation feedback, and status indicators for accessibility. Red error messages and green success alerts must differ in lightness, not just hue. Use our simulator to validate primary/secondary/tertiary color schemes remain distinguishable across all 8 CVD types before implementing in production.
2. Data Visualization & Charts
Simulate color-coded graphs, heatmaps, and dashboard visualizations. Color-blind users cannot distinguish red/green lines on stock charts or traffic patterns on maps. Always add patterns, labels, or icons. Combine with our data tools for accessible analytics.
3. Gaming & Virtual Reality
Test team colors (red vs blue teams), enemy/ally indicators, health bars, and puzzle mechanics that rely on color matching. Many games have added colorblind modes after community feedbackâsimulate during development to avoid accessibility patches post-launch and negative reviews from 8% of male gamers.
4. Brand Identity & Logo Design
Ensure brand colors maintain recognition across CVD types. A red logo that turns brown for Protanopes loses brand identity. Test logo variations, ensure sufficient contrast between foreground/background, and verify secondary brand colors don't clash when perceived differently by color-blind users.
5. E-Learning & Educational Materials
Simulate color-coded diagrams, chemistry molecule models, anatomy charts, and geography maps. Students with CVD cannot follow instructions like "click the red button" or "find the green region." Add text labels, patterns, or numbered regions to ensure learning materials are inclusive and comply with educational accessibility standards.
6. Traffic & Wayfinding Systems
Test signage, airport terminal maps, hospital wayfinding, and subway route diagrams. Critical safety concernâcolor-coded emergency exits, fire alarms, and hazard warnings must use position, shape, or text in addition to color. ISO 3864 safety standards require redundant encoding for this reason.
7. Medical & Scientific Applications
Simulate medical imaging false-color overlays, lab result dashboards, and pharmaceutical labeling. Color-blind medical professionals exist and need accessible interfaces. Test that critical information (abnormal lab values, medication dosing) doesn't rely solely on red/green color coding that CVD users cannot perceive.
8. Print Design & Marketing Materials
Test brochures, posters, infographics, and packaging before printing. CMYK color shifts can amplify CVD issuesâsimulate to ensure call-to-action buttons, product categories, and pricing tiers remain visually distinct. Avoid costly reprints by validating accessibility during the design phase with our image tools.
9. Mobile App Development
Simulate iOS/Android app color schemes under different CVD types. Tab bar icons, notification badges, progress indicators, and form validation need testing. Many apps fail Apple's accessibility review for insufficient color contrastâtest early to avoid submission rejections and ensure App Store accessibility compliance.
10. Presentation & Slide Decks
Test PowerPoint/Keynote color themes for conference presentations. Ensure charts, bullet points, and highlighted text remain readable for color-blind audience members. Projector color accuracy variesâsimulate to guarantee your message reaches everyone regardless of vision type or display quality.
7 Color Accessibility Mistakes That Exclude 350M Users
1. Using Only Color to Convey Information
Violates WCAG 2.1 SC 1.4.1. "Required fields in red" means nothing to Protanopes. Always add icons, text labels, asterisks, or patterns. The form field border color change alone isn't sufficientâinclude "Required" text or * symbol. Test with our simulator to identify violations before user complaints.
2. Red-Green Color Coding (The Classic Mistake)
Red/green combinations affect 8% of males. Stop lights work because of position (top/middle/bottom), not just color. Your UI should too. Use blue/orange, purple/yellow, or add checkmarks/X icons. Deuteranopes cannot distinguish "available" green from "busy" red status indicators without additional cues.
3. Insufficient Contrast Between Interactive Elements
Two colors may pass WCAG contrast against white background but fail against each other. Blue primary button (#0066CC) and purple secondary button (#6600CC) look identical to some CVD types. Ensure Delta-E > 5.0 between adjacent interactive elements. Simulate to validate functional color distinction beyond basic contrast ratios.
4. Assuming Filters Fix Everything
Browser extensions and OS-level color filters help but aren't universal solutions. 80% of color-blind users don't use assistive tools according to Color Blind Awareness. Design natively accessible interfaces instead of requiring users to install software. It's your responsibility, not theirs.
5. Not Testing Entire Color Palettes Together
Individual colors may simulate fine, but problems emerge when combined. Your 5-color chart legend where all colors merge into 2 similar shades for Deuteranopes makes data unreadable. Test the full palette set together, not colors in isolation. Use our simulator for batch testing color combinations.
6. Forgetting About Lightness Contrast
Achromatopsia users see only grayscale. Two colors with identical lightness (red #FF0000 and green #00FF00 both have ~50% luminance) become indistinguishable. Always ensure 20%+ lightness difference between functional colors. Use darker greens with lighter reds, or vice versa, to maintain grayscale distinction.
7. Skipping CVD Testing in Design Process
Retrofitting accessibility is 10x more expensive than building it in from start. Test color choices during wireframing, not after full implementation. Run every color decision through CVD simulation before committing to design systems. Prevention costs hours; remediation costs weeks and legal risk under ADA/Section 508.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between Protanopia and Deuteranopia?
Protanopia is red-blindness (missing L cones), while Deuteranopia is green-blindness (missing M cones). Both cause red-green confusion but affect slightly different wavelength ranges. Protanopes have more difficulty with reds appearing darker, while Deuteranopes struggle more with greens. For practical design purposes, both require the same accommodationsâavoid red/green coding and ensure lightness contrast.
How accurate are CVD simulators compared to real color blindness?
Scientifically calibrated simulators using Brettel 1997 and ViĂŠnot 1999 matrices are 90-95% accurate for most CVD types. Our tool uses these peer-reviewed transformation matrices through LMS color space, matching research standards from Machado et al. 2009. Individual perception varies, but simulations are highly reliable for accessibility testing. Always supplement with real user testing when possible.
What is Delta-E and why does it matter for accessibility?
Delta-E measures perceptual color difference on a 0-100+ scale. Values below 1.0 are imperceptible, 1-2 barely noticeable, 2-5 perceptible at a glance, 5-10 clear difference, 10+ very distinct. For accessibility, aim for Delta-E > 5.0 between interactive elements to ensure CVD users can distinguish them. Higher scores indicate better color accessibilityâour simulator shows Delta-E for every CVD type to guide palette decisions.
Which CVD type should I prioritize testing for?
Deuteranomaly (green-weak) affects 5% of malesâmore than all other types combined. Test this first. Next priority: Protanomaly and Deuteranopia/Protanopia (red-green blind). Together these cover 99% of color-blind users. Tritanopia is rare but easy to accommodate. Always test Achromatopsia (grayscale) to validate lightness contrast works independently of hue.
Can I use this simulator for WCAG compliance testing?
CVD simulation helps verify WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 1.4.1 (Use of Color) by showing whether color is the sole means of conveying information. However, simulators don't replace contrast ratio calculators for SC 1.4.3/1.4.6. Use our tool for qualitative color distinction testing, then validate contrast ratios separately. Combine with our accessibility tools for comprehensive WCAG validation.
What are the best color combinations for color-blind users?
Safe pairs: Blue + Orange (works for all CVD types), Purple + Yellow, Dark Blue + Light Orange. Avoid: Red/Green, Blue/Purple, Light Green/Yellow. Always ensure 20%+ lightness difference between colors. Use high-contrast black/white when possible. Add patterns, textures, or icons to color-coded elements for redundant encoding that doesn't rely on color perception alone.
How is color blindness inherited?
Red-green color blindness is X-linked recessive. Males (XY) need one defective gene to be color-blind; females (XX) need two, making it much rarer in women. That's why 8% of males but only 0.5% of females have red-green CVD. Tritanopia is autosomal dominant (not sex-linked), affecting both sexes equally but very rarely. Learn more from NIH Genetics Home Reference.
Do color-blind people see in black and white?
Noâthat's a common myth. Only Achromatopsia (affecting 1 in 33,000 people) sees grayscale. Most color-blind individuals have Deuteranomaly or Protanomaly, seeing millions of colorsâjust with reduced distinction between certain hues (reds/greens appear more similar). They don't see "less" color overall, they confuse specific color pairs. Simulate to understand their actual perception rather than assuming grayscale vision.
Advanced Color Accessibility Techniques
Multi-Sensory Design
Combine color with shape (circle/square/triangle), position (top/middle/bottom), icons (â/â/!), and text labels. Traffic lights use position redundancyâyour UI should too. This benefits not just CVD users but also low-vision users, elderly users, and anyone viewing on poor-quality displays.
Colorblind Mode Toggles
Offer alternative high-contrast color schemes specifically designed for CVD users. Games like Overwatch and Apex Legends include Deuteranopia/Protanopia/Tritanopia modes that remap colors to accessible alternatives. Test these modes with our simulator to validate effectiveness before shipping.
Pattern-Based Differentiation
Use stripes, dots, crosshatches, and solid fills in charts and graphs. Even if colors merge for CVD users, patterns remain distinct. This technique is required for academic publications to ensure readability in black-and-white photocopiesâit serves CVD accessibility equally well.
Automated CVD Testing in CI/CD
Integrate CVD simulation into automated design system testing. Generate simulated screenshots for every CVD type during builds, compare against baselines, and fail pipelines if color distinction drops below thresholds. Prevent accessibility regressions before they reach production.
Lightness-First Design Methodology
Design interfaces in grayscale first, ensuring perfect contrast and hierarchy without color. Then add hue as enhancement, not primary information carrier. If it works in grayscale, it works for all CVD types. This forces reliance on size, weight, spacing, and layout instead of color dependence.
User-Customizable Color Preferences
Allow users to customize interface colors through theme settings. Provide presets optimized for specific CVD types (Deuteranopia, Protanopia, Tritanopia) plus fully custom palettes. Store preferences server-side so settings persist across devices, showing respect for user accessibility needs.
Related Design & Accessibility Tools
Build fully accessible, color-optimized designs with our complete toolkit:
Ready to Test Your Color Accessibility?
Simulate color blindness instantly with scientifically accurate Brettel 1997 matrices. Test all 8 CVD types, get Delta-E scores, ensure WCAG compliance, and build inclusive designs for 350 million color-blind users worldwide. 100% free, no signup required.
Trusted by designers and developers for accessible color testing