Buffer Generator
Generate custom buffers for penetration testing, fuzzing, and exploit development. Create cyclic patterns, find offsets, and avoid bad characters with multiple encoding formats.
Offset Finder
Find the byte offset of a value in a cyclic pattern (useful for finding EIP/RIP overwrite offset)
Free Buffer Generator: Create Cyclic Patterns for Exploit Development & Penetration Testing
Generate custom buffers instantly for buffer overflow testing, fuzzing, and exploit development. Create cyclic patterns (De Bruijn sequences), find EIP/RIP offsets, filter bad characters, and export to multiple programming languages.
What Is a Buffer Generator (And Why Penetration Testers Need It)?
A buffer generator is an essential tool for security researchers, penetration testers, and exploit developers that creates customized byte sequences for testing buffer overflow vulnerabilities. Buffer overflows remain in the OWASP Top 10 critical security risks, making buffer testing crucial for application security.
Professional buffer generators create cyclic patterns (De Bruijn sequences) where every 3-4 byte substring is uniqueâallowing you to calculate exact offset positions when analyzing crashes. This eliminates manual counting and provides precise EIP/RIP overwrite locations essential for exploit development, similar to Metasploit's pattern_create and pattern_offset tools.
Why Buffer Generators Are Essential for Security Testing:
Exploit Development
- ⢠Find exact offsets: Calculate EIP/RIP overwrite positions instantly
- ⢠Test buffer limits: Determine application crash thresholds
- ⢠Identify bad characters: Detect bytes that break exploits (0x00, 0x0a, 0x0d)
- ⢠Generate shellcode padding: Create NOP sleds and alignment bytes
Fuzzing & Vulnerability Research
- ⢠Automated testing: Generate thousands of test cases quickly
- ⢠Pattern analysis: Use unique patterns to trace execution flow
- ⢠Code coverage: Create diverse inputs for comprehensive testing
- ⢠Save time: Eliminate manual buffer creation for repetitive tests
Real Buffer Generation Examples
Aa0Aa1Aa2Aa3Aa4Aa5Aa6Aa7Aa8Aa9Ab0Ab1Ab2... Every 3-char sequence is unique for offset findingBad chars: 0x00,0x0a,0x0d Removes null bytes, LF, CR from patternunsigned char buf[] = { 0x41, 0x61, 0x30 }; Ready for C/C++ exploit developmentbuf = b"\\x41\\x61\\x30\\x41\\x61\\x31" Direct usage in Python exploit scriptsHow to Generate Buffers in 3 Simple Steps
đĄ Pro Tip: Finding EIP Offset in Debugger
After a crash, check your debugger for the EIP/RIP register value (e.g., 0x41306141). Use our Offset Finder tool below to instantly calculate the exact byte position where your instruction pointer was overwritten. This tells you where to place your return address or shellcode pointer in the exploitâsaving hours of manual offset calculation.
5 Buffer Pattern Types for Different Security Testing Scenarios
Creates a pattern where every n-byte substring appears exactly once (e.g., Aa0, Aa1, Aa2 are all unique). This is the gold standard for exploit developmentâafter a crash, you can calculate the exact offset by finding where your EIP/RIP value appears in the pattern. Identical to Metasploit's pattern_create functionality. Use for: Buffer overflow exploit development, offset calculation, EIP overwrite detection.
Repeats a character sequence (like "AAABBBCCC" or your chosen charset) throughout the buffer length. Simple but effective for testing buffer boundaries and detecting truncation. Can visually identify where data gets cut off in memory dumps or logs. Use for: Basic overflow testing, boundary detection, input validation bypass.
Generates cryptographically random bytes using Go's crypto/rand package. Creates unpredictable test cases for comprehensive fuzzing and edge case discovery. Each generation produces different output, ideal for chaos testing and finding rare crash conditions. Use for: Fuzzing, stress testing, randomized vulnerability discovery.
Creates a sequence of incrementing bytes: 0x00, 0x01, 0x02... 0xFF, then repeats. Perfect for identifying byte position limitations and testing how applications handle sequential data. Useful for finding bad character ranges and detecting byte transformations. Use for: Bad character detection, byte transformation analysis, encoding tests.
Repeats your custom string to the specified length. Create specialized patterns for specific test scenariosâlike NOP sleds (\\x90\\x90\\x90), format string payloads (%x%x%x), or application-specific magic bytes. Complete control over pattern content for targeted testing. Use for: Shellcode padding, format string testing, custom payloads, NOP sleds.
8 Real-World Buffer Generator Use Cases
1. Buffer Overflow Exploit Development
Generate cyclic patterns to find exact EIP/RIP overwrite offsets in Windows/Linux binaries. After causing a crash, use the offset finder to calculate where your instruction pointer landsâthen replace that position with a return address to shellcode or ROP gadget. Essential for OSCP exam preparation and CTF competitions.
2. Bad Character Identification
Test which bytes cause exploits to fail. Generate increment patterns (0x00-0xFF), send to target, and examine memory dumps to find missing or transformed bytes. Common bad chars include 0x00 (null terminator), 0x0a (LF), 0x0d (CR), and 0x20 (space). Avoid these in your shellcode for reliable exploits.
3. Metasploit Pattern Alternative
Replace Metasploit's pattern_create and pattern_offset tools with our web-based generator. No Ruby installation, no command-line dependenciesâgenerate patterns and find offsets instantly in your browser. Export directly to Python, C, or JavaScript for integration with your exploit framework. Perfect for quick testing during penetration engagements.
4. Fuzzing and Crash Analysis
Generate random buffers for automated fuzzing with tools like AFL, LibFuzzer, or custom harnesses. Create thousands of test cases with varying lengths and patterns to discover edge cases. When crashes occur, cyclic patterns help identify exact failure points for root cause analysis and exploit development.
5. Shellcode NOP Sled Generation
Create NOP sleds (\\x90 bytes) or equivalent instructions for increasing exploit reliability. Generate custom patterns with your preferred NOP-equivalent opcodes, adjusting length for buffer size constraints. Export to C arrays or Python bytes for direct integration with exploit payloads. Combine with our random generator for polymorphic NOPs.
6. Format String Exploit Payloads
Generate custom patterns for format string vulnerabilities (printf, sprintf). Create repeating %x or %n sequences to leak memory or write arbitrary values. Test different buffer lengths to find optimal payload sizes for memory disclosure or overwrite attacks in vulnerable applications.
7. Return-Oriented Programming (ROP) Chain Testing
Calculate exact offsets for ROP gadget placement in DEP/NX-enabled environments. Use cyclic patterns to find buffer positions, then construct ROP chains with precise addressing. Export to Python for use with ROPgadget or ropper tools. Essential for modern exploit development bypassing stack execution prevention.
8. CTF and Wargame Challenges
Solve Capture The Flag binary exploitation challenges faster with instant pattern generation. Common in platforms like HackTheBox, TryHackMe, and PicoCTF. Generate patterns, find offsets, test bad characters, and build exploitsâall in your browser without installing security tools.
7 Buffer Generation Mistakes That Break Exploits
1. Not Filtering Bad Characters
Including null bytes (0x00), newlines (0x0a, 0x0d), or other restricted characters breaks exploits silently. Always test for bad chars firstâgenerate an increment pattern (0x00-0xFF), send it, and check memory dumps for missing bytes. Filter out all bad characters before generating your final exploit buffer.
2. Wrong Offset Calculation Method
Manually counting bytes from crashes is error-prone and wastes hours. Use cyclic patterns and our offset finderâafter a crash, the EIP/RIP value tells you exactly where it landed in the pattern. This eliminates off-by-one errors that cause exploits to fail. Always verify offset with a second test before building the full exploit.
3. Ignoring Little-Endian vs Big-Endian
Return addresses must match target architecture's byte order. x86/x64 use little-endian (0x41424344 = \\x44\\x43\\x42\\x41). When manually converting, reverse the byte order. Our hex output shows bytes in orderâremember to reverse when placing addresses in your exploit buffer for Intel architectures.
4. Using Insufficient Buffer Length
Generate buffers larger than expected overflow size to ensure you reach the return address. If the crash point is unknown, start with 1000-5000 bytes. Monitor crashes in debuggers to determine exact required length, then optimize. Shorter buffers may not trigger overflow; excessively long ones might crash before reaching target memory.
5. Not Testing Pattern Uniqueness
Ensure your cyclic pattern is truly unique within the buffer length. Our generator uses standard Metasploit-style patterns (Aa0, Aa1, Aa2) which guarantee uniqueness up to 20,280 bytes. For larger buffers, patterns may repeatâ verify your crash offset falls within the unique range for accurate calculations.
6. Forgetting to Account for ASLR and DEP
Modern protections randomize addresses (ASLR) and prevent stack execution (DEP/NX). Buffer generation is step oneâ you'll need additional techniques like ROP chains, information leaks, or protection bypasses. Test exploits on systems with/without protections to understand requirements for your target environment.
7. Not Verifying Encoding Format
Export format must match your exploit language. Python uses b"\\x41", C uses 0x41, JavaScript uses "\\x41". Copying wrong format breaks syntax. Our tool provides 8 encoding optionsâselect the one matching your development environment. Always test copied buffers compile/run before full exploit integration.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a cyclic pattern and how does it help find offsets?
A cyclic pattern (or De Bruijn sequence) is a string where every n-byte substring appears exactly once. For example, in "Aa0Aa1Aa2Aa3", each 3-character sequence is unique. When an application crashes during buffer overflow testing, the EIP/RIP register contains part of your pattern. By searching for this value in the original pattern, you calculate the exact byte offsetâeliminating manual counting and providing precise overwrite positions for exploit development.
How is this different from Metasploit's pattern_create?
Our tool replicates Metasploit's pattern_create and pattern_offset functionality in a web interfaceâno Ruby installation or command-line access required. We generate identical cyclic patterns and provide the same offset calculation. Additional features include bad character filtering, multiple encoding formats (C, Python, JavaScript), entropy analysis, and instant export options. Perfect for environments where Metasploit isn't available or for quick testing during penetration tests.
What are bad characters and why should I filter them?
Bad characters are bytes that cause exploits to fail or get truncated by the target application. Common examples include 0x00 (null byte terminates strings in C), 0x0a and 0x0d (newlines break line-based protocols), and 0x20 (space in some parsers). When these bytes appear in your shellcode or return address, the exploit stops working. Test for bad chars by sending all bytes (0x00-0xFF), checking memory for missing values, then filtering them from your final payload.
How do I find the EIP offset after a crash?
Generate a cyclic pattern matching your estimated buffer size (try 1000-5000 bytes initially). Send it to the vulnerable application until it crashes. In your debugger (GDB, Immunity Debugger, x64dbg, WinDbg), check the EIP/RIP register value (e.g., 0x41306141). Use our Offset Finder tool belowâenter the pattern length and EIP value to get the exact byte position. This tells you where to place your return address in the exploit buffer.
Which export format should I use for exploit development?
Choose based on your exploit language: Python bytes (b"\\x41\\x42") for pwntools/Python scripts, C array (unsigned char buf[] = { 0x41, 0x42 }) for C/C++ code, JavaScript ("\\x41\\x42") for browser exploits, PowerShell ([byte[]](0x41,0x42)) for Windows post-exploitation. Raw hex (\\x41\\x42\\x43) works universally for documentation. All formats represent the same bytesâjust different syntax.
What's the maximum buffer size I can generate?
Our tool supports buffers up to 1,048,576 bytes (1MB). This exceeds typical buffer overflow requirementsâmost exploits need 500-5000 bytes. Larger buffers are useful for heap overflows, fuzzing large data structures, or testing extreme edge cases. For production exploits, use only the minimum required length to reach the target overwrite location for reliability and stealth.
Can I use this for CTF competitions and OSCP exam?
Absolutely! Buffer generation is a fundamental skill for OSCP certification, CTF events (Hack The Box, TryHackMe, PicoCTF), and security certifications. Our tool replicates industry-standard patterns used by professional penetration testers. Practice exploit development with our generator, then apply the same techniques during exams and competitions. Combine with our hash tools for complete security testing workflows.
How do I test for bad characters systematically?
Generate an increment pattern (0x00-0xFF) covering all possible bytes. Send this to your target application and examine the memory dump in a debugger. Compare sent bytes with received bytesâmissing values are bad characters. Common workflow: (1) Send full 0x00-0xFF, (2) Find missing bytes, (3) Generate new buffer excluding those chars, (4) Re-test until all bytes pass through cleanly. Document bad chars for shellcode encoding selection (e.g., use shikata_ga_nai encoder).
Advanced Buffer Generation Techniques for Exploit Development
Staged Overflow Testing
Start with large cyclic patterns (5000 bytes) to trigger crashes. Once successful, binary search the exact crash length: test with 2500 bytes, then 1250, etc. This finds the minimum overflow size for reliable exploits while avoiding detection by length-based filters or IDS systems.
Multi-Stage Offset Discovery
For complex exploits with multiple overwrite points (saved EBP, SEH handlers, function pointers), generate patterns covering all memory regions. Map each crash to its offsetâyou may need to control multiple addresses for successful exploitation, especially in Windows SEH-based exploits or heap overflows.
Encoding-Aware Pattern Generation
If your exploit travels through encoders (URL encoding, Base64, JSON), test patterns before and after encoding. Some characters change during transmissionâidentify encoding-safe bytes for your pattern. Use our encoder tool to pre-test character transformations.
Entropy Analysis for Shellcode Placement
Our tool calculates Shannon entropyâhigh entropy (random-looking data) may trigger IDS/IPS systems. For stealth, use lower-entropy patterns (alphanumeric charset) or encode shellcode with printable characters. Balance detectability against payload size constraints in your exploit design.
Automated Exploit Generation Pipelines
Script buffer generation, offset discovery, and exploit building for rapid development. Use our API-style generation (customize parameters), extract offsets programmatically, then auto-populate exploit templates. Reduces exploit dev time from hours to minutes for similar vulnerabilities.
ROP Chain Offset Calculation
When building Return-Oriented Programming chains, use patterns to find each gadget's position. Calculate offset for first gadget, add 4 bytes (x86) or 8 bytes (x64) for next gadget address. Precise positioning is criticalâeven one-byte misalignment breaks ROP chains. Test thoroughly before production exploitation.
Other Security & Development Tools
Build complete penetration testing and exploit development workflows with our security toolkit:
Ready to Build Your Exploit?
Generate custom buffers instantly for buffer overflow testing, fuzzing, and exploit development. Create cyclic patterns, find EIP offsets, filter bad characters, and export to C, Python, JavaScriptâ100% free, no signup, privacy-focused.
Trusted by security researchers, penetration testers, and OSCP candidates worldwide